|
PROGRAM DESCRIPTION
"If Women Ruled the World" is a two-hour PBS documentary
special featuring
an historic dinner party that took place June 23, 1999 in Washington,
D.C.'s landmark Senate Caucus Room on Capitol Hill. The dinner was
hosted by Canada's first and only female prime minister, the Honourable
Kim Campbell, and the 19 guests were celebrated women from diverse cultural,
ethnic, generational, and professional backgrounds. They were coming
together to share their experiences and observations as trailblazers
in male dominated fields and to explore the prospects for full gender
equity. The guests included Supreme Court Justice Sandra Day O'Connor, Senator
Kay Bailey Hutchison, General Claudia Kennedy (the highest-ranking woman
in the U.S. Army), feminist pioneer Betty Friedan, Elle magazine's
editor-in-chief, Elaina Richardson, Newsweek's Eleanor Clift, and
supermodel Alek Wek, among others.
The program presents background guest profiles, expert commentary,
and behind-the-scenes vignettes that punctuate the dinner conversation
and help to dramatize and clarify the issues. These cutaways include an
unprecedented roster of the most accomplished women of our time,
e.g., Madeleine Albright, Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Liv Ullmann, Queen
Noor, Martha Stewart, Janet Reno, and Angelina Jolie, among others.
The aim of the program is to convey how historic and unprecedented
women's rise into positions of public power has been, how women's empowerment
is transforming both our work and family lives, and why genuine gender
equity is proving so elusive.
PROGRAM MESSAGE
The consensus of the dinner participants is that women are beginning
to assert a distinctive approach and make a real difference as they
expand their presence in the professions. This distinctive approach
is generally defined as being more social, civil, collaborative,
and inclusive, and it's consistent with rising educational standards
and the evolution of democracy and globalization toward greater
pluralism, decentralization, transparency, and accountability. The
factors influencing this approach include women's traditional role
in the family as the civilizers and unifiers and their experience
as outsiders in the public world.
However, as women humanize and democratize the workplace,
the family itself is being neglected and the matrix for these values
is consequently being eroded. This has created a major impediment
to further advancement for women. It has resulted in the persistence
of wage discrepancies and of the glass ceiling, as both well-educated
young women and older accomplished professional women are the ones
compromising their careers for the sake of the family. It has left
the upper echelons of corporate and political power monopolized
by men without stemming the continuing erosion of family life.
This is a problem of our institutions failing to keep
up with social change. Only when our institutions adapt to accommodate
women and men's dual obligations--to both career and family--will
the real economic and personal promise of women's empowerment, of
finally integrating both our public and private lives, be finally
realized.
WHY A DINNER PARTY?
If Women Ruled the World" was partly inspired by Washington,
D.C. dinner parties and the role that dinner parties have traditionally
played as vehicles for bringing people together from diverse backgrounds.
The very diversity of "If Women Ruled the World" and the
prominent role that women have played as hostesses/facilitators
and arbiters of civilized dinner manners become a metaphor in the
program for how women's empowerment is changing the world.
The tension within every dinner party--between satisfying
selfish, carnal survival needs and adhering to the civilized, rational
demands of the community--also becomes a metaphor for the partly
biological, partly cultural role that gender itself plays in our
lives.
In addition, the informality, freedom, and egalitarianism
of the dinner party dramatizes the democratic impact of women's
empowerment.
WHY AN ALL-WOMEN'S DINNER
PARTY?
In most of Western history starting with ancient Greece, social
dinners tended to be all-male affairs, and they tended to be an
extension of professional life. So the very fact that you can have
a dinner party consisting only of women whose decisions have wide-ranging
social, political, and economic repercussions represents a stark
historic turnaround, one that dramatizes the seismic change that
is taking place in gender roles and relations.
Having only women also helped to facilitate the informality,
intimacy, and candor necessary for a good discussion, and it reinforced
the shared bond.
WHY WASHINGTON, D.C.?
As the backdrop for "If Women Ruled the World," Washington
dramatizes both the complications that women face in acquiring and
exercising power in a world where politics and power have been defined
by men as well as the possibilities that democracy is creating for
women and genuine gender equity.
WHY IS WOMEN'S EMPOWERMENT
RELEVANT?
As Margaret Mead asserted, and the latest research confirm, there
is no evidence to suggest that women as a group have ever exercised
or shared ruling power. Yet today, with women college graduates
now outnumbering male graduates, with half of all incoming law students
in the U.S., 45% of all medical students, and 46% of all U.S. doctorates
being women, with women owning 38% of all U.S. firms and filling
48% of managerial positions, they are finally poised to break through
fossilized gender stereotypes and fundamentally alter the reigning
gender balance of power.
At the same time, women are still no more than a token presence
in the upper echelons of real power and in the corporate boardrooms
and political establishment, the technology gender gap if anything
has been widening, and the average wages for women still haven't
exceeded $.75 for every dollar earned by a man. Not so long ago,
the official view of women as the weaker, subordinate sex belied
women's domination of family and social life; today an official
consensus on gender equity belies pervasive and often unconscious
discrimination, evident in an explosion of substance abuse and eating
disorders among the current postfeminist generation of young women
and in persisting employment inequities.
At this critical crossroads in women's history, if women are to
finally achieve real power as a group for the first time in recorded
history then it is necessary to come together and clarify the lessons
of the past.
|